Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sickler v. Kirkwood

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1997No. Civil 960226Published

1Concurrence

MARING, Justice,

specially concurring.

[¶ 10] I write to join the majority decision to dismiss the appeal on the ground the trial court abused its discretion in certifying the partial summary judgment as final under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b), but for the following reasons.

[¶ 11] There was never a motion requesting the court enter a final judgment under Rule 54(b), N.D.R.Civ.P. During oral argument Sicklers’ counsel admitted he submitted a proposed order for judgment and the court signed it without consideration of the positions of the respective parties. This procedure is not what is contemplated by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Wyatt v. AdamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API