Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
United States v. Johanns
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
Decided October 26, 1983No. ACM 23699Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMiller, Judge
In so far as the majority recognizes that no “custom of the service” exists in the United States Air Force which criminalizes “fraternization” (social intercourse) between officers and enlisted personnel, I concur. See the evidence I presented for this position in United States v. Rodriguez, ACM 23545, 29 October 1982 (unpublished).
In so far, however, as the majority concludes that the absence of such a criminally enforceable “custom" precludes prosecution of those associations between officers and enlisted personnel which any reasonably prudent officer should immediately recognize are…
2Cases cited186 opinions
- Hassett v. Revlon, Inc. (In Re O. P. M. Leasing Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- In Re JablonskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Loftis v. Minar (In Re Montanino)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- Johns-Manville Corp. v. Asbestos Litigation Group (In Re Johns-Manville Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Unsecured Creditors' Committees of Pacific Express, Inc. v. Pioneer Commercial Funding Corp. (In Re Pacific Express, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.