Legal Opinion

Romano v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 17, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00698Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVE ROMANO, an individual, Case No.: 3:20-CV-00698-JLS-KSC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING JOINT 13 v. MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF DISCOVERY DISPUTE 14 AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and 15 [Doc. No. 22] DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery 21 Dispute, in which defendant AT&T Mobility Services, LLC (“defendant” or “AT&T”) 22 moves to compel plaintiff Steve Romano (“plaintiff”)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
  2. Louisiana Pacific Corp. v. Money Market 1 Institutional Investment DealerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  3. In Re California Public Utilities Commission. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Hampton v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1993
  5. Crest Catering Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API