Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Board of County Commrs.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

These two cases involve largely the samé questions, and are considered together, as they were by the trial court.

The actions were taxpayers’ suits, seeking to enjoin further proceedings in the construction of two' sections of turnpike, one known as the Monroe road and the other as the Oxford-Millville road.

The proceedings with reference to these improve ments had reached the point of’ the making of the contracts, and bonds were being sold, or had been sold, and were in process of delivery, to pay for the improvements. Further proceedings were enjoined by the trial court, and from that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knowlton & Breinig v. Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Patrick Bros., A Gen. Partnership v. Putnam Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Thelander v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Seyler v. Balsly, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1965
  4. Tri-County North Local School Board of Education v. McGuire & Shook Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989
  5. Southern Surety Co. v. Moores-Coney Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API