Legal Opinion

Kansas Grain & Live-Stock Co. v. Hartstein

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 21, 1897No. 65Published

• Error from Pawnee District Court. Hon. S. W. Vandivert, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSchoonover, J.

In this case the plaintiff in error, who was the plaintiff below, has failed in his brief to specify the errors complained of in the trial court. There is no statement of facts, as required by the rules of this court. Neither the instructions of the trial court nor the evidence complained of, úpon which he relies for a reversal of this judgment, is set forth, and we cannot tell definitely what errors he relies upon for a reversal of this case. In the case of Baker v. Sears ( 2 Kan. App. 617), this court said :

“The rules of this court upon the subject of briefs were adopted to be observed and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baker v. SearsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API