Maerlender v. Barasch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1028In Action Ho. 2, the order is modified on the law by striking therefrom all matter following the words, “ Ordered that the defendant’s motion for leave to renew is granted,” and substituting in place thereof a paragraph providing that respondent’s motion is denied. As thus modified, the orders are affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the actions are remitted to Special Term to add additional provisions in the orders not inconsistent herewith. The appellant agreed to sell and the respondent agreed to buy certain real property situated in the County of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mott v. . MottNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Van Winkle v. . Van WinkleNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Baker v. DavieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Coe v. Persons UnknownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1857
- Monogram Development Co. v. Natben Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.