Legal Opinion

People v. Illescas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 23, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On the defendant’s direct appeal from the judgment of conviction, this Court found that, upon the record then existing, the defendant received the effective assistance of trial counsel (see People v Illescas, 47 AD3d 840, 841 [2008]). Specifically, this Court stated that “[Reasonable strategic concerns would support counsel’s decision not to request submission of a lesser-included offense” (id.). A review of the record presently before us, which includes the transcript of the hearing held upon the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10, does not change that conclusion.

As held by the Court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. SatterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. People v. IllescasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BirtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. People v. FilerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API