Legal Opinion

Retail Merchant's Business Expansion Co. v. Randall

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 4, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.

This action is to recover the amount due on four trade acceptances, including protest fees and interest. The acceptances are for seventy dollars each, dated October 20, 1927, and payable to the order of the plaintiff one, two, three, and four months after date, respectively. Trial was by jury. At the close of all the evidence each party moved for a directed veri diet. The defendant’s motion was overruled, and the plaintiff’s motion was granted, to both of which rulings the defendant excepted.

On September 10, 1927, the parties entered into a so-called business expansion campaign contract under…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stewart v. . StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. City of Montpelier v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  3. Middlesex Water Co. v. Knappmann Whiting Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  4. Alfred Marks Realty Co. v. Hotel Hermitage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  5. Phelps v. School District No. 109Illinois Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cushman v. OutwaterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  2. Quesnel v. RaleighSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
  3. Agway, Inc. v. MarottiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  4. Mongeon Bay Properties, LLC v. Mallets Bay Homeowner's Assn., Anthony J. Sineni and Merrimack Mortagage Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API