Legal Opinion

Glen View Development Co. v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 21, 1970PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The Township of Moorestown adopted an ordinance requiring electric lines in new developments to be placed underground. Plaintiff, a developer, called upon the defendant utility for this electrical service. Defendant was willing to provide it if plaintiff absorbed the added cost of underground construction over equivalent overhead construction. Plaintiff would not agree. To avoid delay in its project, plaintiff, under protest, deposited the sum in question with defendant, and then brought this action to have it declared that the local ordinance bound defendant to meet the total cost of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodside Homes, Inc. v. Town of MorristownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Port of New York Authority v. Hackensack Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  3. In Re Bd. of Fire Commrs., Fire Dist. No. 3, PiscatawaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Petition of Highpoint Development Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Muise v. GPU, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  2. City of Allen v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  3. City of Allen and Coalition of Cities v. Public Utility Commission of Texas Oncor Electric Delivery Company And Centerpoint Energy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  4. City of Allen and Coalition of Cities v. Public Utility Commission of Texas Oncor Electric Delivery Company And Centerpoint Energy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  5. Robinson v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API