Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Ikerd

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1874PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, C. J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellants, upon two promissory notes. There was judgment for the appellee, upon the default of the appellants. There was no application in the court below to set aside the default, and consequently no question is presented for decision. Fish v. Baher, 47 Ind. 534. The judgment must be affirmed. The supersedefis having been set aside upon the motion of appellee, no damages can be assessed.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fisk v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reed v. SpaydeIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Baldwin v. HumphreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881