Legal Opinion
Brady v. Goldman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 1, 2018No. 17-274-cvPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-appellant James H. Brady, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s judgment entered January 12, 2017 dismissing his complaint with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim and denying him leave to amend his complaint, and its subsequent order entered February 3, 2017 imposing a filing injunction. Brady sued defendants-appellees, who are the lawyers and law firms that represented Brady’s adversaries in prior unsuccessful state court litigation, for violations of New York Judiciary Law •§ 487, fraud, intentional infliction…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Carter v. HealthPort Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Gollomp v. SpitzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Laura Kropelnicki, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Hal Siegel, Linda Strumpf, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brady v. BermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Brady v. IGS Realty Co. L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Brady v. IGS Realty Co. L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Brady v. NYP Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Cai v. Civil Court of the City of New York County of RichmondDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.