People v. E.G.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Dissent
PRESIDING JUSTICE McNAMARA,
dissenting:
I respectfully dissent from the majority holding which finds the trial court erred in not entering an order empowering the minor to refuse transfusions. I take issue with both the majority’s statement of the law and its failure to address the findings of fact upon which the trial court based its decision.
In regard to the applicable law, the majority reasons that as a matter of law the trial court was required to refuse to intervene because the court found the minor made a “mature” decision. In fact, the trial court did not make such a finding.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bellotti v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.