Legal Opinion

Columbian Financial Corp. v. Stork

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 25, 2017No. 16-3339PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Carolyn B. McHugh, Circuit Judge

The district court dismissed Columbian Financial Corporation’s first amended complaint for lack of jurisdiction, holding that Columbian’s . federal-court claims against state officials were precluded by sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment. In reaching this determination, the district court rejected Colum-bian’s contention that it had jurisdiction over Columbian’s complaint pursuant to the exception to sovereign immunity enunciated in Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 28 S.Ct. 441, 52 L.Ed. 714 (1908). Exercising jurisdiction under 28…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Columbian Fin. Corp. v. BowmanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
  2. Odhuno v. Reed's Cove Health & Rehab., LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
  3. Columbian Financial v. BowmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  4. Driftless Area Land Conservancy v. Huebner, TylerDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2020
  5. Hirth v. Iowa Utilities CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API