Legal Opinion

Russell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 19, 1918No. 5202PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Judge.

—The conviction was for murder. A reversal of "the judgment of conviction in this cause must result from the refusal of the trial court to grant a new trial, when it was disclosed on hearing thereof that- one of the jurors who rendered the verdict was an unpardoned convict. The statute required this. Article 692, Code of Criminal Procedure, declares that “one convicted of any felony” is disqualified to sit on a jury, and Article 695 of the Code declares that “no such juror shall be empaneled, although both parties consent thereto.” This court in Rice v. State, 52 Texas Crim.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Bundick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. O'Quinn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dillard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Ex Parte BronsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Lawrence v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. State v. RameyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Fritts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API