Legal Opinion
Division 241 Amalgamated Transit Union (Afl-Cio) v. Lawrence Suscy
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 22, 1976No. 76-1166PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff is a union that represents 5,500 bus operators and others employed by the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA). It has filed a four-count complaint under the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 1983) against eight CTA officials, attacking the constitutionality of Rules 10 and 14 of the General Rule Book and of General Bulletin G2-75 of the CTA insofar as they require CTA bus operators to submit to blood and urine tests when they are involved in “any serious accident,” or suspected of being intoxicated or under the influence of narcotics.
In its memorandum opinion, the district court upheld the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Everett v. NapperCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Robin James, a Married Person in Her Separate Capacity v. Price Stern Sloan, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Penguin Putnam, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- National Treasury Employees Union v. RaabCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Duarte v. HealyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.