In re Ausnit
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
In Matter of Moto Block Import Co. (140 App. Div. 532, 535) the Appellate Division in this department in an opinion by Laughlin, J., stated that the examination either of a witness or of an intended party in advance of the commencement of an action is authorized to perpetuate testimony. This language was quoted with approval in Matter of Hufstutler (220 App. Div. 587) decided by the Appellate Division of this department after the adoption of the Civil Practice Act (see Civ. Prac. Act, § 295). The papers before the court indicate that there is grave danger that if the testimony of the proposed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re of HufstutlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- In re the Moto Bloc Import Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re DavisNew York Court of Claims · 1998
- In re the Accounting of New Rochelle Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1950