Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Com., Dept. of Transp.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 13, 1991No. 999 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALLADINO, Judge.
Gary and Kathleen Hunt and Ingersoll Rand (collectively, Appellants) 1 appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) which granted Department of Transportation’s (DOT) motion to dismiss. We affirm.
Gary Hunt (Hunt) was injured when a truck he was driving slid on a natural accumulation of snow and ice and crashed through a guard rail along Interstate 81. Hunt suffered serious permanent injuries and the truck was damaged. Ingersoll Rand owned the truck operated by Hunt.
Appellants allege that DOT was negligent in failing to properly clear…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vogel v. BerkleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- LUITWEILER v. Northchester Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Huber v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- County of Allegheny v. DominijanniCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. PhillipsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kahres v. HenryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Wujcik v. Yorktowne Dental Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Miranda v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Nader v. HughesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Leedom v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.