Arnold & Son v. Rhodes
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action on bond; from city court of Elberton — Judge Tutt. January 19, 1920. Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
Only beadnotes 2 and 5 need elaboration. The principles underlying each are the same, and they will be covered by the same general discussion. This case arose by reason of the levy of an execution, the giving of a forthcoming bond, and a breach of the bond, the action being against the principal and the surety on the bond. Upon the trial the jury found in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiffs excepted. It is alleged that the *88court erred in admitting in evidence, over the objection of the plaintiffs, certain executions against Rhodes, the principal defendant, of older date than the one…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. BanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Aycock v. AustinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Bemis v. Armour Packing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Carr v. Houston Guano & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Reynolds Banking Co. v. Southern Pacific Guano Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boyd v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Garmany v. LoachCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Seagrayes v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970