Legal Opinion
Howler v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa
Decided January 26, 1909No. 221PublishedCited by 1 opinion
At Law. On defendant’s motion to retax costs. Granted.
1Opinion of the Court
REED, District Judge.
In this case a jury was impaneled, and the taking of testimony commenced and continued for some days, when, during a recess of the court, the parties made and signed a stipulation as follows:
“The above-entitled case is settled upon the following terms: Defendant shall pay to plaintiff, within 15 days from the filing of this stipulation, the sum of $1,500, in full settlement of the cause of action sued upon. Plaintiff to pay costs of his own witnesses attending upon his own subpoena. Defendant to pay all other costs.”
The stipulation was filed in the case, and the entry or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thompson v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. Philadelphia & Reading RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Springville v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Wooster v. HandyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
- Hayford v. GriffithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1853
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Warner v. Liquid Carbonic Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1921