Legal Opinion

Dailey v. . Bay

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaenhill, J.

The court below did not purport to act upon the merits of plaintiff’s appeal from the clerk. Acting under the apprehension that an appeal would not lie from the clerk’s order until the clerk had first followed the procedure outlined by the statute for the laying off of the cartway and the assessment of damages, the judge granted plaintiff’s motion to remand. In this there was error.

The judgment of the clerk is final and, until reversed or modified, is determinative of the rights of the parties'in this controversy. An appeal therefrom is not premature. This court has heretofore determined this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cook v. Vickers.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Warlick v. . LowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Candler v. SluderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Triplett v. . LailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Lowe v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Taylor v. AskewCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API