Tudor v. Ford
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Presiding Judge.
Pursuant to the grant of an interlocutory appeal, we review the denial of summary judgment to Tudor in Ford’s premises liability case.
In reviewing the grant or denial of summary judgment, a de novo standard of review is applied, and we view the evidence with all reasonable inferences and conclusions in favor of the party opposing summary judgment. Goring v. Martinez, 224 Ga. App. 137, 138 (2) (479 SE2d 432) (1996); Gaskins v. Hand, 219 Ga. App. 823 (466 SE2d 688) (1996).
So viewing the evidence presented on summary judgment in favor of Ford, it was that, in July or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Goring v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Gaskins v. HandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Stegall v. Central Georgia Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Hopkins v. Kmart Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McBride v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Parker v. HoversCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002