Crumpton v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
Darius Crumpton appeals his conviction of two counts of burglary. He argues that the trial court should have granted a mistrial after a witness for the State implicated his character and that the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions. Because these arguments lack merit, we affirm.
Appellant was tried for these burglaries along with his two brothers, Curtis Crumpton and Michael Crumpton, and their first cousin, Robert Bowen. All four were convicted on both counts. We recently reversed the convictions of Michael Crumpton because there was insufficient evidence that he…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Kellibrew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Parkerson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Hillman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Richards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001