Legal Opinion

Matusky v. Sheffield Square Apartments

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 1994No. 22A04-9309-CV-333PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RATLIFF, Senior Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellants-defendants, Fran and George Matusky ("Matuskys"), appeal the small claims court's judgment awarding appelice-plaintiff, Sheffield Square Apartments ("Sheffield Square") six hundred ninety dollars ($690.00). We affirm.

ISSUES

Matuskys present two issues for review which we restate as:

I. Whether a small claims judgment is contrary to law when the only evidence supporting an element of the plaintiff's claim is hearsay evidence which was objected to at the hearing.

II. Whether denial of defendant's counterclaim is contrary to Ind.Code 32-7-5-1.

FAC…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Levins v. BucholtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  2. Scholten Pattern Works, Inc. v. Roadway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matusky v. Sheffield Square ApartmentsIndiana Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API