Legal Opinion
People v. Ehrlich
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Marie G. Santagata, J.
Defendants, by separate motions, moved to dismiss this *515indictment on the grounds that the District Attorney failed to give the Grand Jury adequate legal instructions (CPL 190.25 [6]) and tainted the proceedings by presenting evidence of criminal conduct not charged in this indictment (CPL 210.20 [1] [c]; 210.35 [5]). Other grounds for dismissal alleged by the defendants are not considered in view of this court’s decision and order herein.
Upon inspection of the Grand Jury minutes provided by the District Attorney, this court finds that release of all…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Henry v. New York State Commission of InvestigationNew York Supreme Court · 1988