Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. & Hines
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 14, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred M. Ascione, J.), entered April 29,1983, which dismissed a petition to stay an uninsured motorist arbitration demanded by respondent and directed the parties to proceed to arbitration reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is reinstated and the arbitration stayed, and the matter is remanded for a trial as to whether the vehicle involved in an accident with respondent was insured on the date of the *726accident. 11 Respondent Roman Hines served a demand for arbitration against his insurer, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company (Aetna),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zappone v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Albert J. Schiff Associates, Inc. v. FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Viuker v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Katz v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. GiordanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re the Arbitration between Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. & MariAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. StrippoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988