Legal Opinion

Harris v. Alabama

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 22, 1995No. 93-7659PublishedCited by 243 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Alabama law vests capital sentencing authority in the trial judge, but requires the judge to consider an advisory jury verdict. We granted certiorari to consider petitioner’s argument that Alabama’s capital sentencing statute is unconstitutional because it does not specify the weight the judge must give to the jury’s recommendation and thus permits arbitrary imposition of the death penalty.

*506I

A defendant convicted of capital murder in Alabama is entitled to a sentencing hearing before the trial jury, Ala. Code § 13A-5-46 (1994), unless jury participation is waived by both parties and approved…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by243 opinions

  1. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Glossip v. GrossSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Dawson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  4. United States v. John Javilo McCullahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Bottoson v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

238 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API