Taylor v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURKE, Justice.
[¶ 1] Cynthia M. Taylor challenges the denial of her claim for worker’s compensation benefits. Ms. Taylor contends that the decision of the office of administrative hearings (OAH) is not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm.
ISSUE
[¶2] Ms. Taylor presents the following issue for review:
Whether the hearing examiner’s decision to deny benefits is supported by substantial evidence and is in accordance with law.
FACTS
[¶ 3] In March 2002, Ms. Taylor sustained a back injury as a result of a slip and fall on ice. She alleged that the injury was incurred in the course of her…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boyce v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Krause v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Clark v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Carabajal v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Hanks v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Dale v. S & S Builders, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Middlemass v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Rodgers v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Olivas v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Bailey v. State Ex Rel. Department of Workforce ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.