Legal Opinion

Williams v. Zellhoefer

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1973No. 6931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In appellant’s Opening Brief, his counsel specifies five errors. Counsel’s arguments concerning the first four assume facts not in the record on appeal, which consists of the pleadings and a statement of the evidence, submitted by respondents, and settled and approved by the trial court pursuant to NRCP 75 (n). The trial court expressly rejected and disapproved a different statement of the evidence which appellant’s counsel submitted.

On áppeal, appellant’s counsel has made no attempt to confine or relate his argument to such record as is available, which to us seems to justify deciding…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smithart v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Allison v. HaganNevada Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Gardner v. GardnerNevada Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Candler v. Washoe Lake Reservoir & Galena Creek Ditch Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Riverside Casino Corporation v. JW BREWER COMPANYNevada Supreme Court · 1964

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Montesano v. Donrey Media GroupNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Patterson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Western Industries, Inc. v. General Insurance Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Torres v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Moore v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API