Legal Opinion

Donaldson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 28, 2005No. 1D05-0297PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Edrick Donaldson petitions this court for certiorari review of an order finding him competent to proceed with respect to pending criminal charges. He complains that at his competency hearing, the trial court considered only the testimony of the two experts appointed by the court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.210(b), and refused to allow defense counsel to present or even proffer the testimony of a third expert who had examined him.1 Donaldson argues that in so doing, the trial court deprived him of his due process right to a meaningful hearing concerning his present…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Belair v. DrewSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Samson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Vasquez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  5. Patton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. TITA v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  4. Leonard Brown v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. ROBERT JERRY FLEMING v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API