Legal Opinion

Lalakea v. Laupahoehoe Sugar Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1940No. 2326PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a motion by Lily Hewahewa, in her capacity as contingent remainderman expectant and as guardian ad litem of the minor respondent, Thomas Kanamu Lalakea, for taxation of costs. Lily Hewahewa prevailed herein upon her appeal to this - court. (See ante, p. 262.) And under the provisions of R. L. H. 1985, § 3801, costs in this court are allowable to her as the prevailing party.

No objection is made to the cost bill except the single item of attorneys’ fees by way of compensation for professional services rendered by the attorneys for movant as a respondent in the trial court and as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lalakea v. Laupahoehoe Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sharp v. Hui Wahine, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Pancakes of Hawaii, Inc. v. Pomare Properties Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API