Legal Opinion

Esmail v. MacRane

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 25, 1994No. 94 C 380PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NORDBERG, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint pursuant to the Abstention Doctrine and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted.

ALLEGED FACTS

Plaintiffs, Basim Esmail, Zabco Enterprises and Nazco Enterprises (“Plaintiffs”), bring their Complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants Samuel Ma-crane and the City of Naperville (“Defendants”), under color of state law, have violat ed their Fourteenth Amendment constitutional rights…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. N&N Catering Co. v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
  2. N & N Catering Co., Inc. v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API