Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Cross

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 6, 1926No. 11,489PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Cross was plaintiff below and obtained a permanent injunction restraining defendant Schneider from interfering with the connection of Cross’s drain with that of Schneider. Schneider moves for a supersedeas.

His first point is that the complaint states no cause of action. It alleges in substance that plaintiff owned 320 acres north of the Loveland-Greeley road, and defendant owned 160 acres south thereof; that in 1899 plaintiff made an oral agreement with one Eyan, who then owned the said 160, to build an underground drain to drain both farms; that Eyan was to construct the drain from the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Salazar v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Tynon v. DespainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  3. Arthur Irrigation Co. v. StrayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  4. Blake v. BoyeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  5. Hottell v. Farmers' Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Armour & Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Griffin v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API