Schneider v. Cross
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
Cross was plaintiff below and obtained a permanent injunction restraining defendant Schneider from interfering with the connection of Cross’s drain with that of Schneider. Schneider moves for a supersedeas.
His first point is that the complaint states no cause of action. It alleges in substance that plaintiff owned 320 acres north of the Loveland-Greeley road, and defendant owned 160 acres south thereof; that in 1899 plaintiff made an oral agreement with one Eyan, who then owned the said 160, to build an underground drain to drain both farms; that Eyan was to construct the drain from the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Salazar v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Tynon v. DespainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- Arthur Irrigation Co. v. StrayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Blake v. BoyeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Hottell v. Farmers' Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. Armour & Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- Griffin v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932