Matusak v. Bakiorzynski
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The bond and mortgage contain the following clause: “ And it is hereby expressly agreed that the whole of said principal sum shall become due after default in the payment of any installment of principal or interest or any part thereof for thirty days.” By section 254 of the Real Property. Law (as amd. by Laws of 1917, chap. 682) such a covenant must be construed as meaning that the “ principal sum, with all arrearages of interest thereon, shall, at the option of the said mortgagee * * * become and be payable immediately ” after such default.
An installment of interest became due May 25, 1926.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cresco Realty Co. v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Hothorn v. LouisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Cole v. HinckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Osborne v. NorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by1 opinion
- Walsh v. HenelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929