Juskulski v. State

In the court below a jury returned a verdict finding appellant guilty of the offense charged in the second count of the affidavit—selling intoxicating liquor—and that he had been twice previously convicted of violating §4, Acts 1925, p. 144, §2717, Burns 1926, and judgment and sentence by the court was accordingly assessed. Motion for a new trial overruled, and this ruling is the error assigned on appeal to this court.

The motion for a new trial includes several causes, some of which have been waived. Those deserving consideration are: Verdict of the jury contrary to law; verdict not sustained…