Legal Opinion

Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Jones

California Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1891No. 12995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, and in the opinion reported in 68 California, 156.

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, J,

This action was brought by plaintiff against Charles Carroll Moore and Mary Adams Moore to foreclose two certain mortgages. The complaint contained two counts, and stated two causes of action. The *509first was upon a promissory note for fifty-seven thousand five hundred dollars, and a mortgage upon eight different pieces or lots of land to secure it. The note and mortgage were signed by said Charles Carroll Moore, and purported to have been signed by said Mary Adams Moore by her attorney in fact, the said Charles. The second cause of action was upon another promissory note, for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. French v. State Farmers' Mutual Hail InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Stoops v. PistachioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API