Legal Opinion

Baird v. Agricultural Credit Corp.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1934No. File No. 6209Published

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, Oh. J.

The plaintiff, is the receiver of the Eirst State Bank of Stanton. This complaint shows him to be the assignee of twenty-four claims against the defendant corporations, said to have originated as follows:

The Mercer County Agricultural Credit Corporation loaned to the assignors certain sums of money taking as evidence their promissory notes and agreeing that the makers of the notes would be required to pay but ninety per cent, of the sum set forth in the notes, with interest on this ninety per cent, at a specified rate. To secure the payment of these notes chattel mortgages were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Trust Co. v. United Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  2. Uhl v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
  3. Barrett & Co. v. Pollak Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Minkler v. United States Sheep Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Langer v. Fargo Mercantile Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API