Bogart v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
We affirm appellant’s conviction of second-degree murder. Appellant argues that the state failed to prove the necessary elements of the crime, and therefore, that the court should have granted his motion for judgment of acquittal. We disagree.
“Generally, an appellate court will not reverse a conviction which is supported by competent, substantial evidence.” Pagan v. State, 830 So.2d 792, 803 (Fla.2002). “If, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, sufficient…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Lynch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Straight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- DeAngelo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Morgan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Chaffin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Brunette v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hernando County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2023
- Megan E. Lewis v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
- State v. GerzymischNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.