Legal Opinion

(HC) Camel v. Sherman

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 25, 2019No. 2:18-cv-01560Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PERCY LAMONTE CAMEL, No. 2:18-cv-01560-TLN-EFB 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 STUART SHERMAN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On July 31, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Donald Milton Orand v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Bruce Wayne Morris v. Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Tolbert v. PageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Robert TURNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles D. MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API