Legal Opinion
Hoskins v. MIA Associates, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 7, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Brien, J.), dated December 6, 1991, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
Given the indicia of control and supervision over the plaintiff by the defendant MIA Associates, Inc., the Supreme Court properly found as a matter of law that the plaintiff was a special employee of MIA Associates, Inc. (see, Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 NY2d 553; Abuso v Mack…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Richiusa v. Kahn Lumber & Millwork Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Abuso v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- Causewell v. Barnes & Noble Bookstores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Schulze v. Associated UniversitiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Garner v. Two Exchange Plaza PartnersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Lewis v. Summit Office Supply, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996