Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Connor

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 28, 1898Published

Creditor’s Bill.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Knox County; the Hon. John A. Gray, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell

This was a creditor’s bill filed by R. C. Hunt against Sarah Connor and her daughters, Parthena Connor and Philena Connor, to set aside a deed from Sarah Connor to Philena Connor of real estate in Knox county. . Hunt had previously obtained judgment and execution against Sarah Connor for $157.50 and costs, and sought by this bill to remove said deed out of the way of his execution, upon the allegation that said deed was without consideration and executed for the purpose of defrauding said complainant and other creditors of Sarah Connor in the collection of their debts. The bill was answered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conkey v. KnightIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Hupp v. HuppIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Higgins v. WisnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Adkins v. BeaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Batcheller v. BatchellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API