Legal Opinion

Harden v. Kifer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 10, 1940No. 29013PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

Plaintiff Kifer brought this action against defendant Harden for money due on an express oral contract of employment at a specified monthly salary. From a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Defendant makes two contentions: (1) That .the trial court erred in overruling his motion to'quash the summons served upon him, and in permitting the amendment thereof; and (2) that the trial court erred in the admission of certain evidence. We dispose of these in order.

1. Owing to the condition of the record, it is difficult to determine in what respects the summons was defective. From…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Texas Title Guaranty Co. v. MardisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Redcorn v. District CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tyler Boat Works v. SchreinerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API