Legal Opinion
Berry v. Stevinson Chevrolet
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 19, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 90-B-916PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
This matter is before me on: (1) plaintiff Jerald S. Reynolds’ (Reynolds) motion for reconsideration of certain findings of fact and conclusions of law under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b); (2) Reynolds’ and plaintiff Charles H. Berry’s (Berry) motion for prejudgment interest; and (3) Reynolds’ and Berry’s motion to amend the complaint to conform to the evidence presented at trial. The motions have been briefed fully and oral argument is unnecessary. Each motion is denied.
I
Reynolds urges me to reconsider my finding that defendants Stevinson Toyota West…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Graham v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Mcnickle v. Bankers Life And Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Cooper v. Cobe Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schlosser v. VRHabilis, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024