Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Brooklyn Public Library

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur M. Schack J.

This case addresses whether defendant the Brooklyn Public Library (BPL) is a “municipal corporation” and, if it is, whether *311a plaintiff is obligated to serve a notice of claim, pursuant to General Municipal Law §§ 50-e and 50-i, upon BPL as a condition precedent to commencing a tort action against BPL. The court finds it is clear that BPL is not a “municipal corporation” and a plaintiff does not have to file a notice of claim, pursuant to General Municipal Law §§ 50-e and 50-i, to commence a tort action against BPL.

The instant action resulted from a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Teresta v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Van Campen v. Olean General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Sweeney v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Purdy v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Brooklyn Public Library v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sharita T. Patterson v. The City of New York; New York Police Department; Investigator Astarita, Detective assigned to the special patrolman license division; Brooklyn Public Library; and District Council 37 UnionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API