Rodriguez v. Brooklyn Public Library
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur M. Schack J.
This case addresses whether defendant the Brooklyn Public Library (BPL) is a “municipal corporation” and, if it is, whether *311a plaintiff is obligated to serve a notice of claim, pursuant to General Municipal Law §§ 50-e and 50-i, upon BPL as a condition precedent to commencing a tort action against BPL. The court finds it is clear that BPL is not a “municipal corporation” and a plaintiff does not have to file a notice of claim, pursuant to General Municipal Law §§ 50-e and 50-i, to commence a tort action against BPL.
The instant action resulted from a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Teresta v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Van Campen v. Olean General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Sweeney v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Purdy v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Brooklyn Public Library v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.