Legal Opinion

Communications Workers of America v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 27, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 84-CV-4207-DTPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEIKENS, Chief Judge.

The Communications Workers of America (CWA) brings this action against Michigan Bell Telephone Company (MBT) to compel arbitration of grievances arising under a collective bargaining agreement between the parties. In answer, MBT alleges that the dispute between the parties is not

arbitrable. Further MBT counterclaims to enjoin arbitration, alleging that the Grievants seek payments proscribed by § 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 186. Both parties move for Summary Judgment. I have jurisdiction pursuant to § 301 of the LMRA, 29 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Schneider Moving & Storage Co. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Robert Anderson, Jr. v. Alpha Portland Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Communications Workers of America v. Michigan Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API