Schlange v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
Plaintiff Max Schlange has appealed from an order of the workmen’s compensation commission denying his claim for compensation. He was employed by defendant Briggs Manufacturing Company as a toolmaker. Prior to the time of his injury his work usually consisted of machining-round stock about 6 feet long and 1 inch in diameter, held in his machine by a round collet, or chuck. The collet was split into 3 sections and worked inside a cylinder which was controlled by means of a hand lever above Schlange’s head. By pressing- on the lever the cylinder was pushed forward, forcing the collet to press…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- La Veck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Schroetke v. Jackson-Church Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Hagopian v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Monk v. Charcoal Iron Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Williams v. National Cash Register Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wieda v. American Box Board Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Nichols v. Central Crate & Box Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
- May v. AH Powell Lumber CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Fergus v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Fergus v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.