Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Loeb

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 15, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from judgment of the Second District Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The action was for wages and money lent; and the defense -relied upon the -pendency of a prior action for the same cause.

To sustain their, plea the defendants offered in evidence a summons issued from the Fifth District Court, November 27, 1896, returnable December 8, 1896, in an action by the plaintiff against the defendants herein. Indorsed on the summons is an affidavit proving its service on one of the defendants; and upon the face of the process appear these words: “ Plaintiff appeared. A. II. '.Sarasohn. Complaint, wages and money laid out and expended.”

It appears that on the return day…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gold v. BissellNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  2. Risk v. UffelmanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dollar Land Corp. v. F. W. WoolWorth Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Elfenbein v. RosenthalAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API