Rex v. Continental Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Young
delivered tlie opinion of the court.
This is a suit on an accident insurance policy. At the close of the evidence and upon motion of defendant by its attorneys, plaintiff was nonsuited on her claim in excess of $5,542.53, the court directed a verdict in her favor in that amount and judgment was entered accordingly. Error is assigned. The parties appear here in the same order as below and reference will be made to them in this opinion as plaintiff and defendant.
The defendant issued an accident policy to one William M. Bex, the husband of the plaintiff, who was named as beneficiary therein,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hess v. Preferred Masonic Mutual Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Tobin v. National Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- Borovicka v. Bankers Indemnity InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
- North American Acc. Ins. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Long v. United States Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1967