Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Haskell v. Rollins

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 10, 1995No. Nos. 94-0884, 94-1131Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGlickstein, Judge

I concur with the majority on the merits of the action, but disagree on the award of attorneys’ fees by the trial court. As to that, I would reverse and remand with direction to apportion appellant’s responsibility for same in accordance with the interest he received. See § 64.081, Fla.Stat. (1993); Diaz v. Security Union Title Ins. Co., 639 So.2d 1004, 1006 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 649 So.2d 232 (Fla.1994) (holding that cotenants of property each possessing a one-half interest in property are each hable for one-half of the attorneys’ fees awarded); Daugharty v. Daugharty, 441 So.2d 1160…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Diaz v. Security Union Title Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Daugharty v. DaughartyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API