Legal Opinion

Aponte v. Raychuk

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Karla Moskowitz, J.

The New York City Department of Consumer Affairs seeks *865for the first time to enjoin an attorney’s newspaper advertisements as deceptive and misleading to the consumer public. This is an application by plaintiffs for a temporary injunction pursuant to CPLR 6301 and section 20-703 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York to enjoin the defendant, his agents and employees, pending the determination in this action, from certain conduct, including:

"A. Continuing to make false and misleading claims in Defendant’s ads which hold out to the public that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Rabinovitch v. NyquistSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Anonymous v. Grievance Committee for Second & Eleventh Judicial DistrictsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eric M. Berman, P.C. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  2. Eric M. Berman, P.C. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  3. Eric M. Berman, P.C. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API