Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tapp

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 18, 2010No. 1507 MDA 2009PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J:

¶ 1 Sean Eugene Tapp appeals the judgment of sentence imposed following his conviction on retrial of Possession With Intent to Deliver, 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(30). The sentencing judge imposed a term of incarceration double that imposed after the first trial, consigning Tapp to the statutory maximum sentence of ten to twenty years. Tapp now contends that the sentence imposed was presumptively vindictive pursuant to North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969), and argues that the trial court failed to provide an adequate explanation for the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. BullockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Com. v. Conklin, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Com. v. Watson, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. v. Conklin, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API